Как работят слот турнири и как се печелят

Slot tournaments are not random side games; they are structured contests where slot mechanics, scoring, leaderboards, prize pools, bonus rounds, and tournament rules collide in a short, high-pressure window. The smartest players treat them like a math problem with a clock attached. At y888, the edge is rarely in one giant spin. It lives in entry structure, scoring speed, game volatility, and how well the rules reward volume versus raw hits. The common assumption is that luck alone decides everything. That assumption breaks fast once you compare tournament formats, bonus-round triggers, and leaderboard pacing across operators.

Why the leaderboard matters more than the headline prize

Direct ranking statement: the best tournament is not the one with the biggest top prize, but the one with the softest path to the board. In practical terms, that means fewer players, clearer scoring rules, and games that can produce repeatable bursts instead of one-off spikes. At y888, the real question is whether the prize pool is concentrated at the top or spread across enough places to make steady accumulation worthwhile.

Watch for these scoring patterns:

• Total win scoring — every credited win counts, so frequent hits matter.
• Multiplier scoring — big multipliers can erase a slow start in one round.
• Target-score races — the first player to a fixed amount wins, which rewards fast volatility.
• Leaderboard placement — some contests pay only the top few; others pay deep.

A useful comparison is whether the contest rewards consistency or explosion. If a slot has a low base hit rate but rare oversized bonus rounds, the leaderboard can swing violently. If the scoring leans on steady wins, the same player can grind a better position with disciplined session timing.

Push Gaming slot mechanics often show why volatility profile changes tournament value. A title with explosive bonus potential can be excellent in a race format, while a steadier game may suit cumulative scoring. That difference is where many casual entrants misread the board and overvalue the wrong slot.

Where the mathematical edge actually lives

The edge is not hidden in a secret spin pattern. It sits in expected score per minute, variance tolerance, and how the tournament window interacts with the game’s paytable. Players chasing arbitrage-style value look for contests where entry cost is fixed but prize distribution is skewed, then ask whether the field is thin enough to make repeated entries viable under the rules.

Three variables matter most:

1. Spin throughput — faster games generate more scoring events per minute.
2. Bonus frequency — bonus rounds can compress a huge share of total score into a few hits.
3. Prize depth — more paid places reduce the all-or-nothing pressure.

That is why tournament hunters do not just chase popular titles. They compare the contest format to the slot’s mathematics. A high-volatility slot can be superior if the rules reward ceiling scores, while a medium-volatility game can outperform it when the leaderboard is crowded and the payout structure is shallow.

Cross-casino bonus play and the rulebook trap

Cross-casino bonus exploitation starts with one uncomfortable truth: the same tournament can be generous on paper and tight in practice. Entry limits, game restrictions, wagering rules, and disqualification clauses can crush any supposed edge. A player scanning offers across operators should read the fine print before assuming that a bigger prize pool means better value.

Here is where the rulebook becomes decisive:

• Some events cap the number of entries per account.
• Some allow only selected games, which changes your expected score profile.
• Some reset leaderboards in short waves, making late surges more valuable.
• Some tie prizes to bonus funds, which can dilute the practical return.

UK Gambling Commission slot rules are a useful reference point when assessing how tightly tournament promotions are controlled. The regulatory backdrop does not create the edge, but it explains why operators structure contests differently and why some promotions are far easier to exploit than others.

Multi-account angles are where many players get reckless. The platform’s terms usually define what counts as duplicate participation, shared device behavior, or linked payment information. The sharp approach is not to assume loopholes exist; it is to identify whether the rules permit repeated entries through legitimate channels such as separate tournaments, staggered qualifiers, or different promotional pools. The line is thin, and the penalty risk is real.

How y888-style tournaments reward timing over superstition

Timing can matter more than spin folklore. In many contests, entering early gives more attempts to climb the leaderboard, while entering late lets you see where the bar sits before committing. The better move depends on the format. In a race to a fixed score, early entry often wins. In a shortest-session leaderboard, late entry can reduce wasted play once the threshold is visible.

At y888, the strongest players read the contest clock before they read the paytable. If the leaderboard updates slowly, a late burst can be enough. If it updates in real time, the field reacts faster and the value shifts toward early pressure. That is not superstition. That is game theory with a slot skin on top.

Which slot traits beat the field fastest?

The best tournament slots usually share a few traits: quick rounds, visible bonus potential, and enough volatility to separate leaders from the pack. A game that only pays tiny wins can keep you alive, but it rarely creates the score gap needed to dominate a crowded board. A game that pays too rarely can leave you stranded unless the format heavily rewards a single monster hit.

Look for these practical signals:

• Fast spin cycle — more attempts inside the event window.
• Strong bonus ceiling — the kind of feature that can vault a score instantly.
• Clear multiplier structure — easier to judge whether a run is worth continuing.
• Flexible stake options — useful when the rules allow different entry sizes.

Players often overrate famous titles and underrate contest fit. A popular slot is not automatically a strong tournament slot. The right choice is the one whose math matches the event’s scoring model, prize distribution, and time limit. That is the whole game at y888, and anyone chasing the board without checking the mechanics is handing away value

L’articolo Как работят слот турнири и как се печелят sembra essere il primo su Le Ricette di Luci.

L’articolo Pesto di limone proviene da Semplicemente Cucinando.

L’articolo TORTA DI NOCCIOLE CON SUPERFICIE CROCCANTE proviene da .

Se esiste un organo del corpo umano che si deteriora mangiando troppo gelato io ho rischiato seriamente di averlo danneggiato.

Dal 18 al 21 Giugno il “Gelato Festival” ha fatto tappa all’Auditorium Parco della Musica addolcendo le serate romane proprio alle porte dell’estate. Gelato Card alla mano ho assaggiato il maggior numero di gusti possibile per poter giudicare e infine votare il mio gelato preferito.

Delizioso “Ricotta con variegatura di fragole fresche” proposto da Stefania Alibrandi della Cremeria Alpi di Roma, un gelato corposo grazie alla consistenza della ricotta e addolcito dalla variegatura di fragole, votato meritatamente come miglior gelato dalla Giuria Popolare. Golosissimo, è proprio il caso di dirlo, “Peccati di gola”, vincitore del premio assegnato dalla Giuria Tecnica, della gelateria Marron Glaces di Catanzaro, latte, nocciola, cacao, noci pralinate e zucchero, non credo serva aggiungere altro per descriverlo. Esotico il gusto per Expo, mango kiwi e fragola; avvolgente il “Tiramisù di Cremì”; azzardata la coppetta “Ciambellina Tivolese” di Delfina Salvati che ha osato mettendo nel gelato farina di grano, vino e olio; dolcissimo “Mucho Bueno” della Gelateria La Regina in cui la cioccolata bianca ha recitato la parte principale. Buone anche le golosità della Nutella che pur non partecipando alla gara ha proposto una coppetta al cioccolato con l’immancabile nutella sciolta come guarnizione ed uno stecco buono quanto calorico.

Interessante e divertente la parte dedicata all’aula didattica in cui gelatieri esperti hanno svelato i propri segreti e prodotto gelato sul momento.

Buoni i gelati ma non proprio originali come mi aspettavo. Mi sarebbe piaciuto assaggiare una varietà maggiore di gusti, fragola e cioccolata sono stati gli scontati protagonisti di una battaglia a suon di coppette e pochi gelatieri hanno proposto qualcosa fuori dall’ordinario.

Ciò che mi ha deluso maggiormente è stata l’organizzazione dell’evento. Uno spazio grandissimo quello dell’Auditorium sfruttato male, un furgone con il gelato della Nutella, uno dedicato allo Show Cooking ed uno su cui i dieci gelatieri che proponevano il proprio gelato le uniche attrazioni della serata.

Per noi Italiani il gelato è quasi una religione e dal Gelato Festival mi aspettavo qualcosa in più, uno sprint diverso che l’avrebbe reso davvero l’evento più goloso dell’anno.

Per info: www.gelatofestival.it

Continua a leggere…

Questo piatto, la barbabietola arrosto con salsa di pane, ha origine nelle comunità ebraiche dell’Europa orientale utilizzando questo straordinario ortaggio in un modo piuttosto affascinante, cotto in maniera molto semplice, ma accompagnato da una salsa fatta con pane bianco secco o raffermo e aglio che da al piatto uno sprint in più, rendendolo gustoso e accattivante. Naturalmente vanno amate le barbabietole, ma altrimenti non sareste neppure qui a leggere la ricetta ]]> https://foodbloggermania.it/ricetta/barbabietola-arrosto-con-salsa-di-pane/feed/ 0 https://foodbloggermania.it/ricetta/semifreddo-sprint/ https://foodbloggermania.it/ricetta/semifreddo-sprint/#comments Thu, 08 Jul 2021 06:14:44 +0000 makeidea https://foodbloggermania.it/ricetta/semifreddo-sprint/ Continua a leggere..]]>  Semifreddo sprint   Ingredienti 2 tazzine  Caffe’ Moka 170 g Latte Concentrato 4 cu Panna Fresca 450 ml Panna Montata 2  Tuorli Preparazione Sbattete con la frusta 170 g di latte concentrato zuccherato con 2 tuorli, unite 2 tazzine di caffe e 4 cucchiai di panna fresca, fino a ottenere una crema. Incorporate 450 ml di […]

L’articolo SPIEDINI DI PANE E MOZZARELLA ALLA ROMANA VELOCISSIMI proviene da .

Ingredienti:

250 ml latte di mandorle autoprodotto, 1 cucchiaio di sciroppo d’acero, 40 gr semi di chia, 1 mela, uvetta e bacche di goji.

Preparazione:

Versare in ciotola semi di chia, latte e sciroppo e mescolare. Lasciare rassodare in frigo tutta la notte. 

Aggiungere la mela a tocchetti e uvetta e bacche di goji. A piacere si possono anche aggiungere delle fave di cacao tritate.

Buon appetito 

oggi non li freghi comunque e i miei odiano in generale le polpette a meno che non siano meat balls negli spaghetti ma questa è un altra ricetta ..

Io ho imparato ad apprezzare le polpette come svuotafrigo e a volte mi danno grandi soddisfazione ,come queste che vi racconto oggi

INGREDIENTI

verza ,mezza circa 

uovo

pane gratt

grana padano gratt

prezzemolo

noce moscata

pepe sale

una cipolla

aglio

nel mixer ho tritato tutto separatamente e poi unito tutto a crudo …ho fatto delle palline e messe sulla leccarda con carta fotno ,ho spolverato con pane grattuggiato e un filo d olio e asciugato lentamente in forno a 170 gtadi un ora circa.

alla fine sprint a 200 per dorare un po la superficie.

vi metto le due versioni quella al forno e quella fritta ,sicuramente diverse ma buonissime entrambe 

Measuring and offsetting emissions is not a trivial task. In the interest of transparency, this post provides more details on the decisions we made and answers questions that readers may have on the topic. We hope that this will benefit other organizations that are in a similar position to Automattic. We welcome feedback and are happy to answer any other questions you may have.

The decision: For 2020, we decided to purchase offsets from Simoshi via the United Nations’ offset platform. These offsets are produced by improving the efficiency of cooking stoves in Ugandan schools. Emission reductions are achieved by using less wood to cook the same amount of food. This project also has third-party certification from the Gold Standard, and it contributes to nine of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, including No Poverty, Quality Education, and Gender Equality. See the project page and the following video for more details:

Why did we choose this project? Anyone who’s tried to purchase offsets knows that it can be complicated. We don’t have in-house sustainability experts, so we relied on publicly-available information to better understand the topic. Resources we found useful include: Carbon Offset Guide, atmosfair, and Greenhouse Gas Protocol. As the price of offsets varies widely, we chose to follow Microsoft’s approach and set our own internal price of $15 per metric tonne of CO₂e. Simoshi’s project stood out because it matches our budget, has a clear emission reduction mechanism, is certified by the United Nations and the Gold Standard, and has many benefits beyond emission reductions, which align with our company’s values.

What emissions do our offsets cover? Automattic has servers in many data centers around the world, operated by different providers. As we don’t control the data center providers’ choice of energy utilities, we treat the emissions from data center power use as being in Scope 3, i.e., as indirect emissions from our value chain. For each data center, we used publicly-available information from our providers to determine whether they’re powered by renewable resources. This led us to conclude that approximately half of our data center energy use is covered by renewables paid for by the data center providers. For the other data centers, we used our servers’ power consumption logs to get the estimated power used over a period of one year. We then multiplied these figures by 1.5 to obtain a conservative estimate that accounts for power usage effectiveness. Using a variety of resources on grid carbon intensity, such as those published by the American Environmental Protection Agency and the European Environment Agency, we converted these power use estimates to emission estimates. This gave us an overall figure of 1,850 tonnes of CO₂e for 2020.

Why offset rather than reduce emissions? We are aware that offsetting is an imperfect solution. Ideally, we would source all our energy from renewables. In a perfect world, it wouldn’t even be possible to buy energy generated by burning fossil fuels. However, given the current reality, setting our own price on carbon and offsetting non-renewable data center emissions is a good temporary solution. This also gives us a financial incentive to work with providers and shift toward greener data centers. In fact, this sort of shift happened last year when we changed our main European data center to a provider that operates on 100% renewables. We hope to continue making such changes in coming years, i.e., reducing emissions where feasible and offsetting the rest.

Why aren’t we doing more? From watching the climate action space, it seems like every announcement is greeted with demands to do more. This is a positive thing — society should hold companies accountable for their actions. As a company, we believe that we can always do better: The opening sentence of our creed is “I will never stop learning”, and we know that we are “in a marathon, not a sprint.” It is our hope that as we learn more about the space and our impact, we will be able to take stronger climate action.

What are we planning to do next? Automattic is a fully-distributed company. This means that our employees aren’t required to commute to central offices, which leads to significant savings in carbon emissions. However, we historically relied on flying to in-person meetups a few times a year to foster collaboration and bonding. Since March 2020, all business travel has been suspended, and it is still unclear what travel will look like in the post-pandemic world. In any case, as an employee resource group, we are planning on quantifying our travel emissions, and advocating for reducing avoidable trips and offsetting emissions from trips that are deemed essential. One change that is already taking place is aligning more teams around fewer time zones. In addition to helping with synchronous collaboration and decreasing isolation, this will reduce the distance traveled per person once meetups resume. We will share more on other actions we take in the future — watch this space! We also welcome feedback from our customers, so please comment on this post or contact us to share your thoughts.

Measuring and offsetting emissions is not a trivial task. In the interest of transparency, this post provides more details on the decisions we made and answers questions that readers may have on the topic. We hope that this will benefit other organizations that are in a similar position to Automattic. We welcome feedback and are happy to answer any other questions you may have.

The decision: For 2020, we decided to purchase offsets from Simoshi via the United Nations’ offset platform. These offsets are produced by improving the efficiency of cooking stoves in Ugandan schools. Emission reductions are achieved by using less wood to cook the same amount of food. This project also has third-party certification from the Gold Standard, and it contributes to nine of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, including No Poverty, Quality Education, and Gender Equality. See the project page and the following video for more details:

Why did we choose this project? Anyone who’s tried to purchase offsets knows that it can be complicated. We don’t have in-house sustainability experts, so we relied on publicly-available information to better understand the topic. Resources we found useful include: Carbon Offset Guide, atmosfair, and Greenhouse Gas Protocol. As the price of offsets varies widely, we chose to follow Microsoft’s approach and set our own internal price of $15 per metric tonne of CO₂e. Simoshi’s project stood out because it matches our budget, has a clear emission reduction mechanism, is certified by the United Nations and the Gold Standard, and has many benefits beyond emission reductions, which align with our company’s values.

What emissions do our offsets cover? Automattic has servers in many data centers around the world, operated by different providers. As we don’t control the data center providers’ choice of energy utilities, we treat the emissions from data center power use as being in Scope 3, i.e., as indirect emissions from our value chain. For each data center, we used publicly-available information from our providers to determine whether they’re powered by renewable resources. This led us to conclude that approximately half of our data center energy use is covered by renewables paid for by the data center providers. For the other data centers, we used our servers’ power consumption logs to get the estimated power used over a period of one year. We then multiplied these figures by 1.5 to obtain a conservative estimate that accounts for power usage effectiveness. Using a variety of resources on grid carbon intensity, such as those published by the American Environmental Protection Agency and the European Environment Agency, we converted these power use estimates to emission estimates. This gave us an overall figure of 1,850 tonnes of CO₂e for 2020.

Why offset rather than reduce emissions? We are aware that offsetting is an imperfect solution. Ideally, we would source all our energy from renewables. In a perfect world, it wouldn’t even be possible to buy energy generated by burning fossil fuels. However, given the current reality, setting our own price on carbon and offsetting non-renewable data center emissions is a good temporary solution. This also gives us a financial incentive to work with providers and shift toward greener data centers. In fact, this sort of shift happened last year when we changed our main European data center to a provider that operates on 100% renewables. We hope to continue making such changes in coming years, i.e., reducing emissions where feasible and offsetting the rest.

Why aren’t we doing more? From watching the climate action space, it seems like every announcement is greeted with demands to do more. This is a positive thing — society should hold companies accountable for their actions. As a company, we believe that we can always do better: The opening sentence of our creed is “I will never stop learning”, and we know that we are “in a marathon, not a sprint.” It is our hope that as we learn more about the space and our impact, we will be able to take stronger climate action.

What are we planning to do next? Automattic is a fully-distributed company. This means that our employees aren’t required to commute to central offices, which leads to significant savings in carbon emissions. However, we historically relied on flying to in-person meetups a few times a year to foster collaboration and bonding. Since March 2020, all business travel has been suspended, and it is still unclear what travel will look like in the post-pandemic world. In any case, as an employee resource group, we are planning on quantifying our travel emissions, and advocating for reducing avoidable trips and offsetting emissions from trips that are deemed essential. One change that is already taking place is aligning more teams around fewer time zones. In addition to helping with synchronous collaboration and decreasing isolation, this will reduce the distance traveled per person once meetups resume. We will share more on other actions we take in the future — watch this space! We also welcome feedback from our customers, so please comment on this post or contact us to share your thoughts.

Measuring and offsetting emissions is not a trivial task. In the interest of transparency, this post provides more details on the decisions we made and answers questions that readers may have on the topic. We hope that this will benefit other organizations that are in a similar position to Automattic. We welcome feedback and are happy to answer any other questions you may have.

The decision: For 2020, we decided to purchase offsets from Simoshi via the United Nations’ offset platform. These offsets are produced by improving the efficiency of cooking stoves in Ugandan schools. Emission reductions are achieved by using less wood to cook the same amount of food. This project also has third-party certification from the Gold Standard, and it contributes to nine of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, including No Poverty, Quality Education, and Gender Equality. See the project page and the following video for more details:

Why did we choose this project? Anyone who’s tried to purchase offsets knows that it can be complicated. We don’t have in-house sustainability experts, so we relied on publicly-available information to better understand the topic. Resources we found useful include: Carbon Offset Guide, atmosfair, and Greenhouse Gas Protocol. As the price of offsets varies widely, we chose to follow Microsoft’s approach and set our own internal price of $15 per metric tonne of CO₂e. Simoshi’s project stood out because it matches our budget, has a clear emission reduction mechanism, is certified by the United Nations and the Gold Standard, and has many benefits beyond emission reductions, which align with our company’s values.

What emissions do our offsets cover? Automattic has servers in many data centers around the world, operated by different providers. As we don’t control the data center providers’ choice of energy utilities, we treat the emissions from data center power use as being in Scope 3, i.e., as indirect emissions from our value chain. For each data center, we used publicly-available information from our providers to determine whether they’re powered by renewable resources. This led us to conclude that approximately half of our data center energy use is covered by renewables paid for by the data center providers. For the other data centers, we used our servers’ power consumption logs to get the estimated power used over a period of one year. We then multiplied these figures by 1.5 to obtain a conservative estimate that accounts for power usage effectiveness. Using a variety of resources on grid carbon intensity, such as those published by the American Environmental Protection Agency and the European Environment Agency, we converted these power use estimates to emission estimates. This gave us an overall figure of 1,850 tonnes of CO₂e for 2020.

Why offset rather than reduce emissions? We are aware that offsetting is an imperfect solution. Ideally, we would source all our energy from renewables. In a perfect world, it wouldn’t even be possible to buy energy generated by burning fossil fuels. However, given the current reality, setting our own price on carbon and offsetting non-renewable data center emissions is a good temporary solution. This also gives us a financial incentive to work with providers and shift toward greener data centers. In fact, this sort of shift happened last year when we changed our main European data center to a provider that operates on 100% renewables. We hope to continue making such changes in coming years, i.e., reducing emissions where feasible and offsetting the rest.

Why aren’t we doing more? From watching the climate action space, it seems like every announcement is greeted with demands to do more. This is a positive thing — society should hold companies accountable for their actions. As a company, we believe that we can always do better: The opening sentence of our creed is “I will never stop learning”, and we know that we are “in a marathon, not a sprint.” It is our hope that as we learn more about the space and our impact, we will be able to take stronger climate action.

What are we planning to do next? Automattic is a fully-distributed company. This means that our employees aren’t required to commute to central offices, which leads to significant savings in carbon emissions. However, we historically relied on flying to in-person meetups a few times a year to foster collaboration and bonding. Since March 2020, all business travel has been suspended, and it is still unclear what travel will look like in the post-pandemic world. In any case, as an employee resource group, we are planning on quantifying our travel emissions, and advocating for reducing avoidable trips and offsetting emissions from trips that are deemed essential. One change that is already taking place is aligning more teams around fewer time zones. In addition to helping with synchronous collaboration and decreasing isolation, this will reduce the distance traveled per person once meetups resume. We will share more on other actions we take in the future — watch this space! We also welcome feedback from our customers, so please comment on this post or contact us to share your thoughts.

Measuring and offsetting emissions is not a trivial task. In the interest of transparency, this post provides more details on the decisions we made and answers questions that readers may have on the topic. We hope that this will benefit other organizations that are in a similar position to Automattic. We welcome feedback and are happy to answer any other questions you may have.

The decision: For 2020, we decided to purchase offsets from Simoshi via the United Nations’ offset platform. These offsets are produced by improving the efficiency of cooking stoves in Ugandan schools. Emission reductions are achieved by using less wood to cook the same amount of food. This project also has third-party certification from the Gold Standard, and it contributes to nine of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, including No Poverty, Quality Education, and Gender Equality. See the project page and the following video for more details:

Why did we choose this project? Anyone who’s tried to purchase offsets knows that it can be complicated. We don’t have in-house sustainability experts, so we relied on publicly-available information to better understand the topic. Resources we found useful include: Carbon Offset Guide, atmosfair, and Greenhouse Gas Protocol. As the price of offsets varies widely, we chose to follow Microsoft’s approach and set our own internal price of $15 per metric tonne of CO₂e. Simoshi’s project stood out because it matches our budget, has a clear emission reduction mechanism, is certified by the United Nations and the Gold Standard, and has many benefits beyond emission reductions, which align with our company’s values.

What emissions do our offsets cover? Automattic has servers in many data centers around the world, operated by different providers. As we don’t control the data center providers’ choice of energy utilities, we treat the emissions from data center power use as being in Scope 3, i.e., as indirect emissions from our value chain. For each data center, we used publicly-available information from our providers to determine whether they’re powered by renewable resources. This led us to conclude that approximately half of our data center energy use is covered by renewables paid for by the data center providers. For the other data centers, we used our servers’ power consumption logs to get the estimated power used over a period of one year. We then multiplied these figures by 1.5 to obtain a conservative estimate that accounts for power usage effectiveness. Using a variety of resources on grid carbon intensity, such as those published by the American Environmental Protection Agency and the European Environment Agency, we converted these power use estimates to emission estimates. This gave us an overall figure of 1,850 tonnes of CO₂e for 2020.

Why offset rather than reduce emissions? We are aware that offsetting is an imperfect solution. Ideally, we would source all our energy from renewables. In a perfect world, it wouldn’t even be possible to buy energy generated by burning fossil fuels. However, given the current reality, setting our own price on carbon and offsetting non-renewable data center emissions is a good temporary solution. This also gives us a financial incentive to work with providers and shift toward greener data centers. In fact, this sort of shift happened last year when we changed our main European data center to a provider that operates on 100% renewables. We hope to continue making such changes in coming years, i.e., reducing emissions where feasible and offsetting the rest.

Why aren’t we doing more? From watching the climate action space, it seems like every announcement is greeted with demands to do more. This is a positive thing — society should hold companies accountable for their actions. As a company, we believe that we can always do better: The opening sentence of our creed is “I will never stop learning”, and we know that we are “in a marathon, not a sprint.” It is our hope that as we learn more about the space and our impact, we will be able to take stronger climate action.

What are we planning to do next? Automattic is a fully-distributed company. This means that our employees aren’t required to commute to central offices, which leads to significant savings in carbon emissions. However, we historically relied on flying to in-person meetups a few times a year to foster collaboration and bonding. Since March 2020, all business travel has been suspended, and it is still unclear what travel will look like in the post-pandemic world. In any case, as an employee resource group, we are planning on quantifying our travel emissions, and advocating for reducing avoidable trips and offsetting emissions from trips that are deemed essential. One change that is already taking place is aligning more teams around fewer time zones. In addition to helping with synchronous collaboration and decreasing isolation, this will reduce the distance traveled per person once meetups resume. We will share more on other actions we take in the future — watch this space! We also welcome feedback from our customers, so please comment on this post or contact us to share your thoughts.

Measuring and offsetting emissions is not a trivial task. In the interest of transparency, this post provides more details on the decisions we made and answers questions that readers may have on the topic. We hope that this will benefit other organizations that are in a similar position to Automattic. We welcome feedback and are happy to answer any other questions you may have.

The decision: For 2020, we decided to purchase offsets from Simoshi via the United Nations’ offset platform. These offsets are produced by improving the efficiency of cooking stoves in Ugandan schools. Emission reductions are achieved by using less wood to cook the same amount of food. This project also has third-party certification from the Gold Standard, and it contributes to nine of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, including No Poverty, Quality Education, and Gender Equality. See the project page and the following video for more details:

Why did we choose this project? Anyone who’s tried to purchase offsets knows that it can be complicated. We don’t have in-house sustainability experts, so we relied on publicly-available information to better understand the topic. Resources we found useful include: Carbon Offset Guide, atmosfair, and Greenhouse Gas Protocol. As the price of offsets varies widely, we chose to follow Microsoft’s approach and set our own internal price of $15 per metric tonne of CO₂e. Simoshi’s project stood out because it matches our budget, has a clear emission reduction mechanism, is certified by the United Nations and the Gold Standard, and has many benefits beyond emission reductions, which align with our company’s values.

What emissions do our offsets cover? Automattic has servers in many data centers around the world, operated by different providers. As we don’t control the data center providers’ choice of energy utilities, we treat the emissions from data center power use as being in Scope 3, i.e., as indirect emissions from our value chain. For each data center, we used publicly-available information from our providers to determine whether they’re powered by renewable resources. This led us to conclude that approximately half of our data center energy use is covered by renewables paid for by the data center providers. For the other data centers, we used our servers’ power consumption logs to get the estimated power used over a period of one year. We then multiplied these figures by 1.5 to obtain a conservative estimate that accounts for power usage effectiveness. Using a variety of resources on grid carbon intensity, such as those published by the American Environmental Protection Agency and the European Environment Agency, we converted these power use estimates to emission estimates. This gave us an overall figure of 1,850 tonnes of CO₂e for 2020.

Why offset rather than reduce emissions? We are aware that offsetting is an imperfect solution. Ideally, we would source all our energy from renewables. In a perfect world, it wouldn’t even be possible to buy energy generated by burning fossil fuels. However, given the current reality, setting our own price on carbon and offsetting non-renewable data center emissions is a good temporary solution. This also gives us a financial incentive to work with providers and shift toward greener data centers. In fact, this sort of shift happened last year when we changed our main European data center to a provider that operates on 100% renewables. We hope to continue making such changes in coming years, i.e., reducing emissions where feasible and offsetting the rest.

Why aren’t we doing more? From watching the climate action space, it seems like every announcement is greeted with demands to do more. This is a positive thing — society should hold companies accountable for their actions. As a company, we believe that we can always do better: The opening sentence of our creed is “I will never stop learning”, and we know that we are “in a marathon, not a sprint.” It is our hope that as we learn more about the space and our impact, we will be able to take stronger climate action.

What are we planning to do next? Automattic is a fully-distributed company. This means that our employees aren’t required to commute to central offices, which leads to significant savings in carbon emissions. However, we historically relied on flying to in-person meetups a few times a year to foster collaboration and bonding. Since March 2020, all business travel has been suspended, and it is still unclear what travel will look like in the post-pandemic world. In any case, as an employee resource group, we are planning on quantifying our travel emissions, and advocating for reducing avoidable trips and offsetting emissions from trips that are deemed essential. One change that is already taking place is aligning more teams around fewer time zones. In addition to helping with synchronous collaboration and decreasing isolation, this will reduce the distance traveled per person once meetups resume. We will share more on other actions we take in the future — watch this space! We also welcome feedback from our customers, so please comment on this post or contact us to share your thoughts.